Arabic
DayZ creator Dean Hall has sparked controversy among gamers after he lashed out at Valve, accusing the company of normalizing loot box gambling mechanics in Counter-Strike 2.
In an interview with Eurogamer,Hall said:
“I think Valve doesn’t get enough criticism on this topic. I’m frankly disgusted by gambling mechanics in video games, they have no place at all. I challenge developers who think it’s not an issue to share their data with universities begging to study this phenomenon.
Hall’s comments came days after Counter-Strike 2’s economy was thrown into turmoil by an update that allowed players to trade five Covert weapons for rare knives or gloves. Although the change was welcomed by some players, it caused the game’s virtual market to collapse as professional traders lost billions of dollars in market value in a matter of hours.
For years, CS2 has relied on a system of loot boxes and speculation on rare weapons, a model that many critics see as akin to digital gambling, especially since items can be sold for real money via Steam’s internal marketplace.
Although major companies such as EA and Activision have come under similar criticism for these systems, Valve has remained immune to controversy thanks to its positive reputation and reliable platform, but Dean Hall’s statements have reopened the discussion about whether the community is more lenient on Valve than others despite running an economic system that some have described as unregulated gambling under the guise of entertainment.
Do you think Valve deserves to be criticized for its systems within CS2? Do you see loot boxes in games as a form of gambling or just a way to make money?
