Arabic
The surprise announcement of Halo: Campaign Evolved caused a huge stir among gamers and fans of the series, the announcement came after rumors that confirmed the existence of an important announcement related to the series, which actually came true on Friday evening.
However, the controversy did not last long as one of the original developers of the game, Jaime Griesemer, who worked as a stage designer in the first part released in 2001, commented on the news with an interesting statement on X, in which he said:
“Remakes don’t change the past, and in general remakes are soulless and unoriginal.
Fans of the series quickly reacted to Griesemer’s statement on social media, some of whom felt that his opinion was realistic, arguing that modern remakes lack innovation and focus only on improving the graphics without offering the same spirit that characterized the original games.
On the other hand, others defended the new remake, emphasizing that it is an opportunity to renew the experience for a new generation of gamers, especially with the use of Unreal Engine 5, new missions, and an expansion of the story.
One commenter wrote:
The original game was great for its time, but the remake is the only way to make it playable today without it feeling dated.
This controversy opens the door to a deeper question: do remakes revitalize classics with a new spirit or strip them of their originality? Halo has always been a symbol of innovation in the world of shooters, and with the return of Campaign Evolved, the debate about the meaning of innovation itself seems to have resurfaced.
Do you agree with the original developer that remakes are soulless, or do you think Halo: Campaign Evolved will be the rebirth of a legend that made shooter history?
